Re: 1.11 doesn't add sources with nonstandard suffixes when making a binary

[Юрий Пухальский]

Good night, Ralf!

I've tried to use the library as i would have done with LTLIBRARIES,
but apparently it doesn't support it (and from what i remember it
didn't)
Here's a small example from scratch.

2009/12/1 Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>:
> * Юрий Пухальский wrote on Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 09:15:23AM CET:
>> 2009/11/28 Jack Kelly <address@hidden>:
>> > 2009/11/28 Юрий Пухальский <address@hidden>:
>> >>> My bad. I meant noinst_LIBRARIES, so you make a libcommon.a instead of
>> >>> libcommon.la. This goes into LDADD as with libtool convenience
>> >>> libraries.
>> >> I haven't checked it, but does it support library dependencies like
>> >> .la? This i use extensively.
>> >
>> > Yes, you can. See
>> > http://www.gnu.org/software/hello/manual/automake/A-Library.html#A-Library
>
>> I've tried using oldstyle libraries, to no avail... It has made a
>> library like this (last lines of "ar t" output):
>> foo.o
>> libbar.a
>
> I don't follow the conversation, but the output looks bogus; so:
> can you please submit a small example Makefile.am that shows the
> problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
>



-- 
«The good thing about standards is there are so many to choose from.»

foo-1.0.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data