[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?
From: |
Chet Ramey |
Subject: |
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:19:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 1/28/24 9:36 AM, Kerin Millar wrote:
An associated issue is that there presently appears to be no way of suppressing
the processing of CDPATH in bash.
Only by using an absolute pathname. It's a non-optional part of the POSIX
algorithm.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRU chet@case.edu http://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, jwo, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?,
Chet Ramey <=
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Oğuz, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Oğuz, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30