[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?
From: |
Kerin Millar |
Subject: |
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2024 15:38:00 +0000 |
On Tue, 30 Jan 2024 10:13:37 -0500
Chet Ramey <chet.ramey@case.edu> wrote:
> > POSIX Programmer's Manual (cd(1p) manpage) says this:
>
> I don't know what this is.
Some operating systems helpfully offer packages containing POSIX material in
the form of man pages. The pages covering the shell and standard utilities have
a section of "1p".
https://repology.org/project/man-pages-posix/versions
--
Kerin Millar
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, (continued)
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Oğuz, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Oğuz, 2024/01/28
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Kerin Millar, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?, Chet Ramey, 2024/01/30
- Re: cd"": Shouldn't it fail?,
Kerin Millar <=