[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Feb 2023 13:40:25 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080
Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
CC| |nickc at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
Hi Tom,
It is not clear to me how the 'n' symbol type is ever generated, but the code
in bfd/syms.c:decode_section_type() makes it clear that the description in
the
documentation is wrong. So how about this rewording:
'n'
The symbol is in a non-data, non-code read-only section.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/30080] New: nm docs mention read-only twice, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2023/02/04
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice,
nickc at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2023/02/06
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, address@hidden, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/02/07