[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice
From: |
nickc at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2023 12:27:11 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30080
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #5)
> See commit a3b6428fe79.
.comment and .note eh ? I wonder why they would have symbols ? Still fair
enough, such symbols can obviously be produced. I stand by the updated
description of the 'n' symbol though.
Thanks for pointing out that commit Andreas.
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/30080] New: nm docs mention read-only twice, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2023/02/04
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/02/06
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, tromey at sourceware dot org, 2023/02/06
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, nickc at redhat dot com, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice, address@hidden, 2023/02/07
- [Bug binutils/30080] nm docs mention read-only twice,
nickc at redhat dot com <=