[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections
From: |
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections |
Date: |
1 Nov 2005 19:42:01 -0000 |
------- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-01 19:42 -------
OK. So, I take it, from your lack of responsiveness to my question, that you
believe that whenever ill-formed code exposes a particular implementation
technique in someone else's library, we should implement Classpath in the same
way.
But what happens if Sun changes this, as they have a perfect right to do? Do
you want us to change it back?
What if BEA or IBM do it differently?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24618
- [Bug classpath/24618] New: equals method for collections, subanark at gmail dot com, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, aph at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, subanark at gmail dot com, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, aph at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, subanark at gmail dot com, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, aph at gcc dot gnu dot org, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, subanark at gmail dot com, 2005/11/01
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections,
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org <=
- [Bug classpath/24618] equals method for collections, subanark at gmail dot com, 2005/11/01