[Bug classpath/28096] parseFloat and parseDouble faulty on small numbers.

[jan at gatespacetelematics dot com]

------- Comment #3 from jan at gatespacetelematics dot com  2006-06-22 07:32 
-------
Subject: Re:  parseFloat and parseDouble faulty on small numbers.


Just to clarify one thing. I checked out the gcc tree (rev 114881)  
and built that. Was your fix included in that?

    /Jan

On 21 jun 2006, at 23.06, Jan Stein wrote:

>
> I checked out the latest from SVN today. But the result was worse.  
> The Double result now changed sign:
>
> % /usr/local/bin/gij -version
> java version "1.4.2"
> gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.2.0 20060621 (experimental)
>
> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.   
> There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR  
> PURPOSE.
>
> % /usr/local/bin/gij j
> Double.MIN_VALUE = 4.9E-324
> Float.MIN_VALUE = 1.4E-45
> String Double.MIN_VALUE = -1.060997895E-314
> String Float.MIN_VALUE = 1.4012985E-45
>
>      /Jan
>
> On 21 jun 2006, at 16.22, tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> ------- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-21  
>> 14:22 -------
>> Is there any way you could try cvs head classpath?
>> I fixed a bug in this code which may affect the results.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>>
>>            What    |Removed                     |Added
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> -------
>>                  CC|                            |tromey at gcc dot  
>> gnu dot
>>                    |                            |org
>>              Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
>>      Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
>>    Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-06-21 14:22:34
>>                date|                            |
>>
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28096
>>
>> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
>> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28096