[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem
From: |
fkung at redhat dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem |
Date: |
19 Oct 2006 21:35:47 -0000 |
------- Comment #5 from fkung at redhat dot com 2006-10-19 21:35 -------
I've committed a patch to address this issue; the INT_RGB buffered image type
should be optimized again, with similar performance to the 0.92 release.
In the long term, I think BufferedImage.setRGB needs to be looked at and
optimized if possible. The difference between the optimized behaviour (using a
straight array copy) and the fallback setRGB method is unacceptably large, and
images that do not have a compatible colour model (ie, BufferedImage
TYPE_INT_RGB or TYPE_INT_ARGB) still need to use the setRGB method.
--
fkung at redhat dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29510
- [Bug awt/29510] New: BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, david dot gilbert at object-refinery dot com, 2006/10/18
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, david dot gilbert at object-refinery dot com, 2006/10/18
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, roman at kennke dot org, 2006/10/18
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, david dot gilbert at object-refinery dot com, 2006/10/19
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, fkung at redhat dot com, 2006/10/19
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem,
fkung at redhat dot com <=
- [Bug awt/29510] BufferedImage / Graphics2D performance problem, cvs-commit at developer dot classpath dot org, 2006/10/20