[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200:
From: |
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org |
Subject: |
[Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement |
Date: |
23 Jan 2007 00:51:22 -0000 |
------- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 00:51 -------
> In what sense is the "i++" code "reachable"?
Only in the technical sense laid out by the JLS, i.e., this is
reachable only in a pedantic and somewhat useless way :)
Comment #2 is the best way to go -- pick a single Base64, preferably
a non-ugly one, and nuke the others.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29370
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, kevwalsh at gmail dot com, 2007/01/22
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement,
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org <=
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, bug at naffah-raif dot name, 2007/01/23
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, csm at gnu dot org, 2007/01/23
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, bug at naffah-raif dot name, 2007/01/24
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, rsdio at metastatic dot org, 2007/01/24
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, bug at naffah-raif dot name, 2007/01/25
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, bug at naffah-raif dot name, 2007/01/25
- [Bug classpath/29370] classpath/gnu/java/security/util/Base64.java:200: warning: Unreachable statement, csm at gnu dot org, 2007/01/31