|
From: | Matthew Woehlke |
Subject: | Re: Clarification regarding linux command "ls". |
Date: | Fri, 11 May 2007 14:04:01 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20070221 Thunderbird/1.5.0.10 Mnenhy/0.7.4.0 |
sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote:
We found a scenario while testing "ls" command in linux (Linux 2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux). We got same results for "ls -la" and "ll",where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual pages.
That shouldn't happen. Many systems create an alias 'll="ls -l"' (which is why it has no man page), but 'ls -l' != 'ls -la'. At the very minimum -la will show you also '.' and '..'.
kindlly revert back ASAP.
Revert what? Is adding 'unalias ll' to your .profile what you want? -- Matthew find / -user your -name base -print | xargs chown us:us
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |