[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarification regarding linux command "ls".
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Clarification regarding linux command "ls". |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2007 09:03:34 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
sai nagendra bhavani prasad wrote:
> We found a scenario while testing "ls" command in linux (Linux
> 2.4.20-8 #1 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux). We got same results for "ls
> -la" and "ll", where as "ll" command is NOT found in the manual
> pages.
>
> kindlly revert back ASAP.
Your reported generated discussion that you may read using the
following URL:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-05/msg00117.html
The belief is that many software distributors provide a pre-existing
alias 'll="ls -l"'. The 'll' command is not part of GNU coreutils.
(Although it is a traditionally included command for many Unix systems.)
Bob