Re: [PATCH] sort: Improve sort --random-sort test.

[Jim Meyering]

address@hidden (Bob Proulx) wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> so if your test were to run sort -R twice, and compare *those* outputs,
>> then it would trigger on this bug.
>
> Thanks.  I don't have a system with the failure so I was working
> blind.  Here is a rework of the patch.

> +2007-07-26  Bob Proulx  <address@hidden>
> +
> +     sort: Improve sort --random-sort test.
> +     * tests/misc/sort-rand: If "locale" is available pick a random
> +     non-C locale and check "sort --random-sort" behavior using it.

Thanks!
Applied and pushed.