[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Not a bug but...
From: |
Andreas Jaeger |
Subject: |
Re: Not a bug but... |
Date: |
29 Mar 2001 07:22:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) |
"Rainer Mager" <address@hidden> writes:
> I don't think this is a bug but I figured it was worth asking...
>
> I just installed 2.2.2 and noticed that libc.x.y.z.so is signifcantly
> smaller than previous versions. Everything appears to be working fine. Is
> that correct? Why is it so much smaller?
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4101324 Mar 1 2000 /lib/libc-2.1.3.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4828950 Jan 25 12:38 /lib/libc-2.2.1.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1389525 Mar 29 08:18 /lib/libc-2.2.2.so
Did you strip the library?
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs address@hidden
private address@hidden
http://www.suse.de/~aj
- glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Ulrich Drepper, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/28
- Re: glibc 2.2.2 compiling error, Andreas Fehr, 2001/03/28
- Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/28
- Re: Not a bug but...,
Andreas Jaeger <=
- RE: Not a bug but..., Rainer Mager, 2001/03/29
- Re: Not a bug but..., Andreas Jaeger, 2001/03/29