[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery
From: |
phr-2000 |
Subject: |
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery |
Date: |
29 Sep 2000 09:57:24 -0000 |
I measured a^b mod c for random 1024-bit numbers a, b, c:
mpz_powm (1024) 16.375ms
That's pretty good!
I then run "openssl speed 1024" on the same machine. I don't know how
to interpret these numbers:
rsa 1024 bits 0.0066s 0.0004s 152.6 2660.1
The number of interest is 152.6. It means openssl did 152.6 1024-bit
RSA decryptions (each consisting of two 512-bit modexps and a CRT
recombination) per second. A 1024-bit modexp is maybe 3x as expensive
as a 1024 bit RSA decryption because of the CRT. So that means
OpenSSL should do around 50 1024-bit modexps/sec or about 20 msec
each, which means GMP is actually beating OpenSSL. I'm pleasantly
surprised.
Can I ask what cpu you did that test on?
You could also try "openssl speed rsa2048" which does 2048-bit RSA
operations (two 1024-bit modexps plus the recombination). As the
operands get bigger the modexps should dominate the calculation more.
- symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/27
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/28
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery,
phr-2000 <=
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Werner Koch, 2000/09/29