[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery
From: |
phr-2000 |
Subject: |
Re: symbol catenation and montgomery |
Date: |
29 Sep 2000 10:32:33 -0000 |
Thanks. That's interesting since the OpenSSL timing is about 1.5x
faster than a 600 mhz Athlon that a friend of mine tested a few months
ago.
Perhaps he didn't use GMP 3.1? We had the redc code in GMP 3.0, but
the cutoff point between O(n^2) redc and (O(M(n)) division wasn't
right.
No I mean OpenSSL vs. OpenSSL timings on 600 vs. 750 mhz versions of
the same CPU. I don't think the OpenSSL x86 arithmetic code has
changed anytime recently.
Btw, you might like looking at some of Dan Bernstein's papers on
fast arithmetic, at http://cr.yp.to.
- symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/27
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/28
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery,
phr-2000 <=
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, phr-2000, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Werner Koch, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Torbjorn Granlund, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Werner Koch, 2000/09/29
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Kevin Ryde, 2000/09/30
- Re: symbol catenation and montgomery, Niels Möller, 2000/09/29