[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870 |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:53:48 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <E1LKMsw-0005wG-G6@etlken.m17n.org>, Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
writes:
> > It appears that there is a bug in all the decode_coding_* functions when
> > a CR lies on a CHARBUF_SIZE (0x4000) boundary with a matching LF on the
> > other side of the boundary.
> > They all do something like:
> > if (eol_crlf && c1 == '\r')
> > ONE_MORE_BYTE (byte_after_cr);
> > but ONE_MORE_BYTE will abort the decode if it reaches the end of the
> > buffer, leaving the CR in limbo between having been read and being added
> > to the buffer. Then on decoding the subsequent block, the initial LF
> > does not trip the normal CRLF decoding, so it is put into the buffer.
> ??? decode_coding_* gets bytes from coding->source and
> produces characters in CHARBUF. So, I think the above
> analysis is not correct.
> As normal visiting of ChangeLog.870 doesn't have the problem
> but revisiting it causes the problem, I think the bug is in
> Finsert_file_contents; perhaps in the handling of REPLACE.
> I'll have a look at it.
I fixed the bug. Actually what wrong was decode_coding_*
but in the different place as above.
---
Kenichi Handa
handa@m17n.org
bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Kenichi Handa, 2009/01/06
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870,
Kenichi Handa <=
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, martin rudalics, 2009/01/07
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Kenichi Handa, 2009/01/07
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, martin rudalics, 2009/01/07
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Kenichi Handa, 2009/01/12
- bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/01/12
bug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/01/07
Message not availableMessage not availablebug#870: Repeatable instance of bug#870, Jason Rumney, 2009/01/07