[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038 |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:18:36 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Apparently so -- that is why I suggest making Emacs use 64 bits
> > even if the operating system uses 32 bits.
> What do you do with time_t fields of 'struct stat', 'struct timeval',
> and other structures used by library functions? They will still wrap
> around.
Emacs can't fix the operating system, to be sure. But it could use 64
bits for time values when not passing them through the system.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, (continued)
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038,
Richard Stallman <=
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/12