[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038 |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:18:52 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> It would be nice if those headers worked on 32-bit Emacsen, but on the
> other hand, there's very little reason to use a 32-bit OS these days, so
> it's not really a pressing issue. And it gets less pressing each year.
To get rid of 32-bit OS's soon would be a fine solution.
Gabriel <beauchampgabriel@gmail.com>, can you tell us why you
still use one? If you have a good reason, it might indicate
some problem we should try to solve.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org www.gnu.org
Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software.
Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call.
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, (continued)
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038,
Richard Stallman <=
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/12