[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 21:09:31 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: 19302@debbugs.gnu.org, ivan@siamics.net
> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:01:22 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> The problem is in parsing dates in the far future. Web pages, for
> >> instance, popularly use an Expiry: header saying that the page expires
> >> in the year 2100 as a synonym for "never expires".
> >
> > So we are going now to reinvent all the strftime stuff, complete with
> > localized names of months, days, etyc., is that so?
>
> Not at all. I'm just explaining what the use case it.
I understood, and even agreed.
> My solution would be to just document this ("Emacs does not support
> dates further into the future than 2038 on OS-es with 32-bit
> time_t") and move on.
Yes.
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, (continued)
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/11