[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038 |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:49:15 +0200 |
> From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net>, 19302@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:31:20 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > So such an Emacs will be broken anyway after 2038, because it will be
> > unable to interpret file attributes, use interval timers, etc.
>
> The problem is in parsing dates in the far future. Web pages, for
> instance, popularly use an Expiry: header saying that the page expires
> in the year 2100 as a synonym for "never expires".
So we are going now to reinvent all the strftime stuff, complete with
localized names of months, days, etyc., is that so?
> It would be nice if those headers worked on 32-bit Emacsen, but on the
> other hand, there's very little reason to use a 32-bit OS these days, so
> it's not really a pressing issue. And it gets less pressing each year.
Indeed.
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/07
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/07
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/08
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Gabriel, 2014/12/10
- bug#19302: [PATCH] bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/11
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Andreas Schwab, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Ivan Shmakov, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Eli Zaretskii, 2014/12/09
- bug#19302: 24.4.51; `date-to-time' fails after 2038, Richard Stallman, 2014/12/10