[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library' |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 18:12:32 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 37930@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > > commentary, in a Lisp library
> > > dynamic-library-alist
> > > find library
> > > image-load-path-for-library
> > > library
> > > library compilation
> > > library header comments
> > > library search
> > > Lisp library
> > > load-library
> > > locate-library
> > > seq library
> > >
> > > `seq library' does not belong here.
> >
> > Disagree. You are assessing index entries from
> > a completely wrong angle.
>
> What angle is that?
That of consistency. As expressed by "doesn't belong".
> You disagree that `seq library' doesn't belong.
> Fair enough. Why do you think it belongs?
That's a wrong question, when talking about index entries. the
important question is "is it useful?"
> Maybe there's a good reason for entry `seq
> library'. It's not obvious to me.
Not obvious to you doesn't mean you should file a bug report, or that
we should continue discussing this.