[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library'
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#37930: 26.3; Elisp manual: please remove index entry `seq library' |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 19:10:00 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 08:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
> Cc: 37930@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > > You disagree that `seq library' doesn't belong.
> > > Fair enough. Why do you think it belongs?
> >
> > That's a wrong question, when talking about index entries. the
> > important question is "is it useful?"
>
> Fair enough. Read it that way then, if you
> want to quibble.
"Quibble", thanks a lot.
> To me, it doesn't belong - it shouldn't be
> present, because I don't see it as especially
> useful. But I'll be glad to learn how it is.
How else do you get to functions from that library in the manual?
> > Not obvious to you doesn't mean you should file a bug report, or that
> > we should continue discussing this.
>
> I should file a bug report when I think it can
> help improve Emacs. And that's what I do.
>
> Please don't tell others when or whether they
> _should_ file bug reports.
Your bug report was considered and rejected. Why do you continue
arguing instead of accepting the decision? This is a recurring
pattern with you, and one that makes it so unnecessarily hard handling
your bug reports. People avoid responding to your bug reports because
of that. I myself sometimes avoid them. This is unnecessary, and
actually harms Emacs.
Please consider not arguing about decisions to close your bug reports.
> You can close any report that you don't think is helpful.
I already did. But it doesn't seem to help, not with bugs filed by
you.