bug#42323: 26.3; Doc string of `seq-map'

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> Or IF understanding the implementation is really necessary, then the
> fact that seq.el is implemented using cl constructs can't be elided.

This is the current doc string:

---
seq-map is a compiled Lisp function in ‘seq.el’.

(seq-map FUNCTION SEQUENCE)

  Other relevant functions are documented in the sequence group.

Return the result of applying FUNCTION to each element of SEQUENCE.

This is a generic function.

Implementations:

#'(sequence sequence) in ‘seq.el’.

Undocumented

#'sequence in ‘seq.el’.

Undocumented
---

It is, indeed, pretty obscure.  Like Drew, I wonder -- do we really have
to put these implementation details in the doc string at all?  Opinions?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no