[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#42323: 26.3; Doc string of `seq-map'
|
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
|
Subject: |
bug#42323: 26.3; Doc string of `seq-map' |
|
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:19:02 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
> Maybe we can find a compromise, e.g. a list of all implementations,
> comma separated, not wasting much space, and then what we have now but
> only for those implementations that have a docstring. With the rule
> that an implementation should have a docstring if and only if the
> interface has some special property. Does that make sense?
Yeah, sounds good to me. I came off way more categorical than I
intended -- I was mostly just musing out loud here.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no