[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU co
From: |
Lars Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU copyleft?" still relevant? |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Sep 2021 18:23:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
> Take a look at this list, for example "Welte vs D-Link (2006)":
>
> https://wiki.fsfe.org/Migrated/GPL Enforcement Cases
>
> IANAL, YMMV, etc. but some of these look like court cases to me?
Yeah, outside the US there's been cases (a French court recently had a
case where they basically said that the GPL couldn't be used the way we
want it to be), but I assumed that this section was about the US...
since the FSF is a US company.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU copyleft?" still relevant?, Richard Stallman, 2021/09/07