[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU co
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU copyleft?" still relevant? |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:07:22 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Is the below entry in the Emacs FAQ still relevant? These days, we
> > have had several copyright infringement case involving the GPL. Could
> > we just delete the entry in the FAQ?
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_license_litigation
> and I didn't see any judgements on GPL'd software? Just settlements
> (and judgements on other licenses, like the Artistic License).
It may not be "obsolete" but it should be replaced to refer people to
what we publish about the GPL in https://gnu.org/licenses/.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
bug#50446: Emacs FAQ entry "What is the real legal meaning of the GNU copyleft?" still relevant?, Richard Stallman, 2021/09/07