> Yes, it is. <SOME KEY SEQUENCE> is, of course, TAB. Here is a patch
> for people to try out which I will push in a few days time if there are
> no objections. Cc-ing completion-style specialist Stefan.
Implementing it as a completion style seems wrong.
What is "it"? "It" === "Eli's suggestion"?
Why not just tweak the completion table?
What tweak do you suggest? The explicit point in this patch
was _not_ to list shorthands as completions, for the reasons
that I gave many times already and that led to Eli's suggestion.
If you can implement that without a completion style that's fine
(but it seems it's the nicest way).
João