[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Oct 2021 15:59:05 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> In this thread, we've described many ways how that can be done.
> C-x o already "pays attention" to them, from day one, but that attention
> is somehow deemed insufficient. So you'll have to be clearer about
> what you're suggesting exactly, i.e., "what happens when".
As an ELisp programmer, I'd want (and expect) that if I can successfully
use `st-bar` and `st-foo` in the current buffer, I will see them in the
possible completions at least when I complete `st-` and ideally in other
cases (e.g. it would be good for completion of `sba` to take `st-bar`
into account if `flex` completion style).
Stefan
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, (continued)
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/02
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/03
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/03
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/03
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/04
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs,
Stefan Monnier <=
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/06
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/10
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/10
- bug#50959: [PATCH] Re: bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/10
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2021/10/03
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Phil Sainty, 2021/10/02
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/02
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, Phil Sainty, 2021/10/02
- bug#50959: 28.0.50; Shorthand symbols are unknown to Emacs, João Távora, 2021/10/02