|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#50344: C-x v keybinding for vc-print-branch-log |
Date: | Thu, 14 Oct 2021 02:37:24 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 |
On 13.10.2021 13:12, Filipp Gunbin wrote:
OK, then I guess the follow-up question is, do we obsolete 'vc-transfer-file' as well? It's the only caller of 'vc-switch-backend' outside of interactive invocations. 'vc-transfer-file' can also be used by 'C-u M-x vc-next-action', but it seems like a very rare workflow as well. Though more plausible than the use of 'vc-switch-backend' by itself.Personally I don't use either of these commands, so this is a question to others..
I guess there's little point to be too ambitious here, given that vc-transfer-file is not interactive, and changing vc-next-action's signature is not in the cards now anyway.
And we don't have an actual mechanism for obsoleting only a part of command's calling convention.
I have pushed the change which obsoletes vc-switch-backend now.Which should remove the main obstacle to adding the branches map with good binding in Emacs 29.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |