bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:

> Do we really need both the `dig' and the `run-dig' commands?
>
> Should one of them be obsoleted?  If we want to be able to specify both
> query-type and server, we could consider using double and triple
> prefixes for that.  Or even write a transient.

Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a wrapper
around the "dig" program) and has worse output.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no