[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2022 13:37:09 +0300 |
> Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>, 56432@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 11:36:06 +0200
>
> close 56432 29.1
> thanks
>
> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Lars> Looks like `run-dig' should be obsoleted (since it's just a
> > wrapper
> > Lars> around the "dig" program) and has worse output.
>
> Thanks, now done (commit 707124d2b9).
Such a hurry...
run-dig seems to be able to guess the host using
net-utils-machine-at-point, something 'dig' doesn't. So if we want to
tell people top use the latter, IMO we should teach 'dig' that trick.
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Robert Pluim, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07