bug#56473: 28.1; named-let void-function error unless byte-compiled

[Michael Heerdegen]

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
> > Maybe Stefan had not added it on purpose?  The correct way to use this
> > macro is to (require 'subr-x).  An autoload won't inhibit broken
> > compilation.  Your change blurs one symptom of a programmer error.
>
> Autoloading macros works fine, doesn't it?

You mean, when compiling?

Michael.