bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org,  steven@stebalien.com
> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:20:08 +0200
> 
>     Eli> Which forward rules would conflict with a backward rule triggered by
>     Eli> U+FE0E?
> 
>     Robert> All the ones for the non-emoji codepoints that still need to be
>     Robert> composed as emoji sometimes, eg U+261D:
> 
> Oh, and all the <foo>+skin tone ones. And probably more.

What do you mean by <foo>+skin?  Can you give a few examples?