bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate

[Robert Pluim]

>>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 19:41:55 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:

    >> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
    >> Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org,  steven@stebalien.com
    >> Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:20:08 +0200
    >> 
    Eli> Which forward rules would conflict with a backward rule triggered by
    Eli> U+FE0E?
    >> 
    Robert> All the ones for the non-emoji codepoints that still need to be
    Robert> composed as emoji sometimes, eg U+261D:
    >> 
    >> Oh, and all the <foo>+skin tone ones. And probably more.

    Eli> What do you mean by <foo>+skin?  Can you give a few examples?

Anything using 1F3FB..1F3FF, such as 1F44B 1F3FB or 1F3C4 1F3FB

Robert
--