bug#64128: regexp parser zero-width assertion bugs

[Mattias Engdegård]

19 juni 2023 kl. 05.04 skrev Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>:

> `^` is only special if it's at the beginning of a group, so `^*` will
> always treat this * as a literal, right?
> "Similarly" `$` is only special if it's at the end of a group, so `$*` will
> always be a repetition of the $ character no?

Yes, ^ and $ have additional rules for when they are plain literals and not 
subject to these bugs at all.

The literal-splitting powers of ^ have now (075e77ac44) been removed.

> So the remaining problematic elements are \` \' \b and \B

\`* has been observed, so we probably need to keep that working as well.

> I suspect if we don't want to signal errors, the next best thing is to
> treat them like group B.

Yes, maybe; they are less likely to be followed by an operator-literal, but it 
would also be good to have all zero-width assertions work the same way.
On the other hand, it can't be worse than we have now, as long as we get rid of 
the "quack,\\b*" semantics.