bug#67061: [PATCH] Improve syntax highlighting for python-ts-mode

[Yuan Fu]

> On Dec 14, 2023, at 3:51 AM, Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:
> 
> On 14/12/2023 07:54, Yuan Fu wrote:
>>> I think the 'definition' feature is good for it (going by the name, since 
>>> it's an implicit variable declaration), but it could be split off into a 
>>> separate feature too.
>> As long as it’s not added to the definition feature, because, again, 
>> definition is at level 1 and I don’t want to keep level 1 minimal.
>> Maybe we can use local-definition, or something similar, to signify that 
>> this feature highlights scoped definitions.
> 
> But you think function parameters should be in 'definition'? They are also 
> "scoped", I would say.

I don’t think function parameters should be in ‘definition’. In fact, in my 
head, only the variable/function/class name of top-level constructs should be 
in ‘definition’. Now I can see that the name ‘definition’ is too vague for my 
original intent, and most ts modes probably don’t share the same interpretation 
as I do...

Maybe we can allow definition to include more things and move it to level 3, 
and add a more restricted ’top-level-definition’ to level 1 to take it’s 
current role. WDYT?

Yuan