[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-i
From: |
Sean Whitton |
Subject: |
bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2023 10:34:09 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Hello,
On Tue 19 Dec 2023 at 08:58pm +02, Juri Linkov wrote:
>>> Both are already shown: M-C-i pops up the *Completions* buffer
>>> and activates in-buffer candidates. If you want M-C-i only
>>> to activate in-buffer candidates, then the line above
>>> should be removed from `completion--in-region`.
>>
>> When I said "provide both", I meant both your idea of how the feature
>> should work, and my idea of how it should work. I didn't mean both the
>> in-buffer candidates and the *Completions* buffer.
>>
>> What you've said isn't true, though: a single TAB, which is bound to
>> completion-at-point in Eshell, does not show in-buffer candidates, nor
>> does it pop up the *Completions* buffer.
>
> Because ls<TAB> is complete, but not unique. So it requires the second TAB,
> exactly as in the minibuffer. A single TAB does this on incomplete candidate,
> e.g. l<TAB>.
Ah. This is not the bug. We may have been subtly miscommunicating.
I am talking about completing the first argument to the command, not
the 'ls' command itself.
So for example:
1. emacs -q
2. (setopt icomplete-in-buffer t)
3. M-x icomplete-mode
4. M-x eshell
5. cd ~/src/emacs/
6. ls l<TAB>
It takes a second <TAB> to have Emacs display leim, lib, lib-src, lisp etc..
--
Sean Whitton
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, (continued)
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/09
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/09
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/09
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/10
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/10
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/11
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/15
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/19
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/19
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/19
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer,
Sean Whitton <=
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/20
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/22
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/23
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/29
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/29
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/12/29
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/29
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/12/30
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Sean Whitton, 2023/12/30
- bug#67661: 30.0.50; *Completions* has started popping up for icomplete-in-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2023/12/30