[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Latest BFD snapshot doesn't fix problem
From: |
Haroldo Stenger |
Subject: |
Re: Latest BFD snapshot doesn't fix problem |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:49:27 -0500 |
Alan,
I see. That was it!
I feel greatly thankful towards you.
Regards,
Haroldo.
Alan Modra wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 05:29:46AM -0500, Haroldo Stenger wrote:
> > to debug ld. Anyway, the more informative ld error message is way far more
> > useful than the no clue one before. Will it be kept?
>
> Yes, it has been committed to the official sources.
>
> > I'm interested in the final
> > diagnostic of the problem, just in case I come accross it again.
> >
>
> You almost certainly sufferred a RAM error or a disk/IO bus error.
> Dumping the relocs out with readelf shows:
>
> 00002b6d 2de04 R_386_PLT32 00000000 set_nv
> 00002b79 2d603 R_386_GOT32 00000000 _tmp_2_
> 04002b8e 2ce03 R_386_GOT32 00000000 mv_names
> 00002b9a 2cf04 R_386_PLT32 00000000 cpy_var
> 00002ba7 2d304 R_386_PLT32 00000000 _fgs_signal_a
>
> I reckon the 04 is a single bit error.
>
> Alan