Re: Problem with SH5 linker?

[Stephen Thomas]

Hi Nick,

I downloaded binutils-020516, & this does indeed seem to fix the problems.
So thanks for your help.

Steve Thomas
SuperH (UK) Ltd.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Clifton" <address@hidden>
To: "Stephen Thomas" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>;
<address@hidden>; "Sean McGoogan" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: Problem with SH5 linker?


> Hi Stephen,
>
> > address@hidden(1087)% sh64-superh-elf-gcc -ml -c y.c
> > address@hidden(1088)% sh64-superh-elf-ld -r y.o
> > sh64-superh-elf-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format
> > elf32-sh64l (y.o) to format elf32-sh (a.out) is not supported
>
> This is reasonable.  The default target for the linker is "elf32-sh"
> so you would not expect it to be able to reconcile "elf32-sh64"
> relocs.
>
> > address@hidden(1089)% sh64-superh-elf-ld -m shlelf32 -r y.o
> > sh64-superh-elf-ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format
> > elf32-sh64l (y.o) to format elf32-sh64l (a.out) is not supported
>
> This has been fixed in the current (CVS) binutils sources.
>
> > address@hidden(1092)% sh64-superh-elf-ld -m shlelf32 y.o
> > sh64-superh-elf-ld: warning: sh5 architecture of input file `y.o' is
> > incompatible with sh output
> > sh64-superh-elf-ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol start; defaulting
to
> > 0000000000001000
>
> This has also been fixed.
>
> Cheers
>         Nick
>