bug-gnu-utils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: How to add crh.po, and address@hidden locale's .po for gettext


From: Denis Barbier
Subject: Re: How to add crh.po, and address@hidden locale's .po for gettext
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:20:05 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:15:21AM -0500, Reshat Sabiq wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Danilo Šegan yazmış:
> > Hi Reshat,
> > 
> > Yesterday at 23:14, Reshat Sabiq wrote:
> > 
> >> Isn't there already address@hidden locale? Since ije isn't fully spelled
> >> out there
> > 
> > No.  That one might be present in outside sources such as belocs
> > (Denis Barbier's collection of locales) simply because GNU libc
> > maintainer(s?) don't accept locales for dialects. 
> Wow. That's a new nuance. Is belocs as widely accepted as glibc?

No, I believe that Debian and its derivatives are the only one to have it,
and this is an extra package, locales come from glibc by default.

> For instance, do Fedora or SUSE users get address@hidden or address@hidden 
> from
> the distro, or do they have to install it on their own because it's
> not in glibc?

They have to install it by hand.

> In short, is there a big motivation for a locale to be in glibc, as
> opposed to just being in belocs?

Well, you are the one being motivated, so it is up to you ;)

> Also, am i right to conclude that if a locale makes into glibc, it
> will be included in belocs?

Yes.

Denis




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]