[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer
From: |
Rod Roark |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: checker vs. chequer |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 07:04:08 -0700 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
On Monday 16 June 2003 06:45 am, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> ...
> Well, I guess that those who contribute to the documentation decides,
> and I reckon we'll have to live with some inconsistencies from one
> chapter to another. I don't think we should enforce that the British
> contributors write "analyze" or vice versa that American contributors
> should write "analyse".
I concur. For what it's worth I find the "Britishisms" to
be a refreshing touch. Incidentally, as a practical matter
I implemented the domain name parlourplay.com in addition to
parlorplay.com. :-)
-- Rod