[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ? |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:21:26 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Holger wrote
>
> >Alternatively, we can make three dividers:
> >
> >Missed doubles around DP: 0% - 60%
> >Missed doubles around CP: 60% - 80%
> >Missed doubles around TG: 80%-100%
> >
> >Perhaps that makes more sense.
>
> This I like much more. If you don't mind I'll implement this.
No problem, but you have to add a few more elements to statcontext.
> >No, you should compare the value with aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ].
>
> Just to confirm whether I understood: aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] should
> equal arDouble[ OUTPUT_OPTIMAL ] ?
No, the aaarPoints array contains the game winning chance at the various
points, so the test should be something like:
rDPDivider = ...
rCPDivider = ...
if ( aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] <= rDPDivider )
/* missed double around DP */
...
else if ( aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] <= rCPDivider )
/* missed double around CP */
...
else
/* missed double around TG */
and same logic for wrong doubles.
Jørn
pgpVV2EYijcjf.pgp
Description: PGP signature