Re: [Bug-gnubg] Missed doubles problem ?

[Holger]

At 19:21 04.09.2003 +0000, Joern Thyssen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:15:58PM +0200, Holger wrote
> >
> > >Alternatively, we can make three dividers:
> > >
> > >Missed doubles around DP: 0% - 60%
> > >Missed doubles around CP: 60% - 80%
> > >Missed doubles around TG: 80%-100%
> > >
> > >Perhaps that makes more sense.
> >
> > This I like much more. If you don't mind I'll implement this.
>
> No problem, but you have to add a few more elements to statcontext.

Hmm, why is that? I planned to return a 2-value-array from 
getMarketWindowDividerMWC(). In there I should be able to compute both 
dividers easily. And then I just compare aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] like 
below.

> > >No, you should compare the value with aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ].
> >
> > Just to confirm whether I understood: aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] should
> > equal arDouble[ OUTPUT_OPTIMAL ] ?
>
> No, the aaarPoints array contains the game winning chance at the various
> points, so the test should be something like:

No, you misunderstood. Sorry for not being clear. I didn't mean what I have 
to compare. I was just asking whether the statement above is true. I 
figured out the logic below from your last mail.

> rDPDivider = ...
> rCPDivider = ...
> if ( aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] <= rDPDivider )
>    /* missed double around DP */
>    ...
> else if ( aarOutput[ 0 ][ OUTPUT_WIN ] <= rCPDivider )
>    /* missed double around CP */
>    ...
> else
>    /* missed double around TG */
>
> and same logic for wrong doubles.

Regards,

        Holger