[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] RE: Strange FIBS ratings
From: |
Albert Silver |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] RE: Strange FIBS ratings |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:08:14 -0300 |
> > Ok, I understand. Might it not be a good idea, presuming the data is
> > correct, to correlate the way it calculates ratings, and attributes
> > grades using this data?
>
> In fact, Kees already suggested that a few days ago, but nobody
replied.
I remember but was waiting to see your opinion first. I also wasn't
aware of the significant difference in the weight of the cube errors
compared to checker errors.
> Personally I've no opinion on this matter as I don't use the textual
> rating for anyting.
I use it in order to better understand how well, or how poorly, I and my
opponent are playing. My understanding now is that the FIBS rating
attributed is a more accurate measure, in which case I will undoubtedly
pay closer attention to this.
BTW, I realize there is significant debate on the evolution of the
player records, but on a more immediate basis, would it be possible for
it to give the FIBS rating as well since this doesn't require any extra
data?
Albert
>
> Jørn
- [Bug-gnubg] Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Christopher D. Yep, 2003/09/09