[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings
From: |
Albert Silver |
Subject: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Sep 2003 02:30:37 -0300 |
> If we assume that the calculates ratings are closer to reality, why
not
> drop the "textual ratings" altogether?
Because people like them, and they are a convenient, easy-to-remember
title representing a range of ratings as opposed to a specific rating at
all times. This is rampant in other games, where titles of Master, Dan,
1st Category, etc. are used despite the existence of a precise rating
system.
Albert
>
> -Joseph
>
> Joern Thyssen wrote:
>
> >>
> >>>you make large cube errors.
> >>
> >>Ok, I understand. Might it not be a good idea, presuming the data is
> >>correct, to correlate the way it calculates ratings, and attributes
> >>grades using this data?
- [Bug-gnubg] Strange FIBS ratings, Albert Silver, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joseph Heled, 2003/09/05
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Joern Thyssen, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Jim Segrave, 2003/09/08
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Christopher D. Yep, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Douglas Zare, 2003/09/09
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, Christopher D. Yep, 2003/09/10
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Strange FIBS ratings, kvandoel, 2003/09/08