bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] An evalutaion of the pruning nets


From: Øystein Johansen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] An evalutaion of the pruning nets
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 17:38:18 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Segrave wrote:
| Given the enormous speed increase from the pruning nets, I am inclined
| to agree with Joseph Heled that we should simply remove reduced
| analysis.

Me too! I also agree that the reduced evaluations can be removed. I
believe that the "old" reduced evaluation gives more deviations from the
"ordinary" nets than the pruning net reduction.

I suggest that the reduction code stays in the code with preprocessor
#ifdefs for the completness. If someone wants to make a build with the
reduced search, he may still build it with a preprocessor #define.

- -Øystein


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBe8xq6kDTFPhwyqYRAqY1AJ9u5PXELkatPlqN1dZlCoKz1fgytwCfb5G3
qaVGFcxAsaKSi3N7bEjYOQA=
=81hv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]