Ingo, regarding your original cache
test, would it be possible to send me your matches that you analyzed for this
test. These 5 matches must have been pretty short.
It
were real word FIBS 7pt matches I played around the time of the benchmark,
randomly chosen with a bit of a focus on "long" 7pt
matches.
I am wondering if the way you
use Gnugb from the command line with the types of matches you are running
result in cache performance that differs significantly from me.
Command line, I've also attached the scripts used. Please note that
they are not polished and I've edited them during benching so the number of
loops in the scripts may just do apartial test when used as-is. Use with care
and a brain. Otherwise that's exactly what I
did.
My normal usage from the command line is
to load a Match play match, usually between 5 and 15pts run an analysis and
save the sgf file along with html. This is done in batch or individually.
Having cache on makes considerable difference. If I can get your matches and
run them in your experiment I’d like to see what I get.
Would be great to hear about the
results.
[..]