[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark
From: |
Mark Higgins |
Subject: |
[Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:28:08 -0500 |
How does gnubg perform against the pubeval benchmark in cubeless play?
I ask because I'm playing around with a backgammon network and have got one
that wins 83% of games and +0.945ppg against pubeval (10k cubeless games). This
is a single 80-hidden-node network with outputs for prob of win, prob of gammon
win, and prob of gammon loss; and just the original Tesauro inputs. 0-ply.
But in the TD-Gammon scholarpedia article it says that TD-Gammon 2.1 in 1-ply
mode wins only +0.596ppg against pubeval. (I think 1-ply here means the gnubg
0-ply.)
http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Td-gammon
That seems really low compared to my result, since I'm pretty sure 2.1 had
gammon outputs and also extra customized inputs.
So I'm wondering if I'm interpreting this correctly, or if I have an
incorrectly-setup version of pubeval, or something like that.
- [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark,
Mark Higgins <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Nikos Papachristou, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Nikos Papahristou, 2012/01/19