[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark
From: |
Mark Higgins |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:35:24 -0500 |
I used the following post to define pubeval; is this the proper definition
still:
http://www.bkgm.com/rgb/rgb.cgi?view+610
?
On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just run 10000 1 point match games between gnubg and pubeval. I
> think this is the most fair, since there are no gammons of cubes
> involved.
>
> However, gnubg won 9840 of those, which makes me think something is wrong.
>
> Can someone help me verify that pubeval makes the "right" moves?
>
> I can send a few games in oldmoves format, or can check specific moves.
>
> I am attaching 2 games as examples.
>
> -Joseph
> <game1.fibs><game2.fibs>
- [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/17
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Nikos Papachristou, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark,
Mark Higgins <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Nikos Papahristou, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Mark Higgins, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Nikos Papahristou, 2012/01/19
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark, Joseph Heled, 2012/01/19