[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug-gnubg Digest, Vol 129, Issue 7
From: |
Frank Berger |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug-gnubg Digest, Vol 129, Issue 7 |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Aug 2013 19:36:32 +0200 |
Hi JD,
@JD: so if I got you right, you played 10 7-pt matches against yourself and one
side lost 9 of them. I've never heard of such a occurence in the real life. It
is an obvious fact that with true random the result must be 5:5 and this can
statistically surely proved. Too bad that I lack this skill, but for me it's
obvious.
More serious: writing a good Backgammon AI is difficult. Writing a complex
program is difficult. Writing a random number generator is far easier. Using an
international rewarded, hundreds of times tested RNG is trivial. Do you believe
that all that smart guys developing Gnu-BG all fail in a trivial issue and
don't recognize it in the last 15 years?
@all Other: How often do you have convinced one of the conspiracy theorists?
From my experience it's < 20%
ciao
Frank
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug-gnubg Digest, Vol 129, Issue 7,
Frank Berger <=